The Watchtower of Destruction: The Ferrett's Journal - I Hads Me A Good Essay, But It Wents Away
[Recent Entries][Archive][Friends][User Info]
08:39 am
[Link] |
I Hads Me A Good Essay, But It Wents Away No, seriously. I had two good ideas for things to write about today, but they both got clobbered by circumstance.
The funny thing is that I keep a rough list of things I want to talk about on LJ in my head. I don't always get to 'em, and some of them will float around for months before eventually settling into an entry - I talked to Gini about my "Have A Beer" theory of Presidential elections three weeks ago, and only recently did I finally think to write it down. At any given time, there are about seven or eight topics that I have on the "should write about" list.
But there are two ways a given entry can get temporarily pushed off the list, even if it was ready to go:
1) Awful coincidence. This happens a lot with my "Taking responsibility for your life and your communication" essays. I'll be thinking, "You know, I should probably write about the way that some people ask for advice, and then get all upset when they actually get some." And I'll have a reasonably-decent way to approach that topic sketched out in my head...
...and then a friend of mine will ask for advice, and she'll get advice she didn't want, and she'll go fucking psycho.
There's no way I could convince that friend that this essay wasn't about her, even though it wasn't. She just happened to do the stupid thing I was talking about on a day when that essay was ready to roll. But no, she'd feel like I was picking on her, and rightfully so, and by Gaw I don't want that kind of drama in my life. So I tuck it away, putting my little psycho-blurb in storage, and sometimes I forget to take it out again.
2) Lack of time. I was standing behind Gini when she wrote yesterday's thoughts on why the Virginia shootings evoked a frenzy of anguished postings from LJ, whereas the much deadlier Baghdad bombings got nothing. And I smiled and said to her:
"You must not have much to do today, huh?"
There are a lot of posts I don't make just because I don't have the time to argue 'em properly. For example, it's not like I don't have more thoughts on the need for legalized health care in America... But given that my first post on the topic got me 250+ replies and a shitload of arguments in the threads, that's an investment. I need at least two hours to write something big like that, since it's a fairly serious topic, and then I have to storm into the comments to clarify what I said, and by Gaw I just don't have a day to do that.
(That's not even counting the Fatal Three, essays I wrote or half-wrote that I will never publish because Jesus Christ I don't want that drama, and they're not even really political topics but that's life for ya.)
It's not like I don't have thoughts on a lot of things on current events. But cutting through the dense arguments of rules lawyers (who can be spotted by the way they shift their debate whenever they're losing) and idiots with agendas and people who misread me so badly I can only assume it's purposeful and , worst of all, the people who disagree with me intelligently and actually bring up new points, well... That's a lot of writing. And I have programming to do, baby; I gotta keep my head in the classes so I can churn out the good stuff for my boss Pete.
You want controversy? Go to bradhicks. He's serving my function for awhile; good, solid thoughts on shit that would suck up all my scheduling. Alas, this week I gotta get ready for Penguicon, and it's all full.
Speaking of Penguicon, does anyone know how to record long voice conversations with a Treo 750? I have two gigabytes of RAM drive to spare, but no idea how I might use my Treo to podcast the panels I'll be on. Unless someone else wants to help me podcast - I'll host, you record....
|
|
| | You could always make really controversial posts, turn comments off, and watch people's heads explode with the overwhelming but frustrated need to tell you off. It would be just beautifully sadistic. How can he watch with comments off? He just has to imagine. :)
me, I think it'd be interesting to at least get the title of those "I'll never post them" essays. The most rabid would find ways to communicate their displeasure, after stewing in their own juices long enough to really get mad. Highhanded posts in their own journals, off-topic comments on older posts, and indignant emails are just a few off-the-cuff ideas. However, only the most furious and determined would go to that length, meaning that the amount of commentary he'd have to wade through would be vastly reduced.
It'd be fun. Then I'd get emails. Those are worse.
Stripped of the public necessity to be nice, they can get downright evil. And then I have to respond. Wow, eviller than in comments? That' s a scary thought. By "legalized health care" do you mean "socialised health care"? I thought you THRIVED on the arguing.
Why do you think I keep trying to earn a living from it?
Until that day, arguing's the sideline. The day job is programming. I think you should pad your resume with an opinion column in a free weekly newspaper. ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/118664398/117261) | | From: | lots42 |
| Date: | April 19th, 2007 01:52 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
A newspaper column is the way to go. That way, when one gets fat and lazy, you can run reader's letters and just do a fourth of the work. ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/118664398/117261) | | From: | lots42 |
| Date: | April 19th, 2007 01:51 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Hell, with the way U.S. health care is, it might as well be illegal for all the hoops and backdoor dealings you have to go through with it. Sometimes I feel like taking a Ving Rhames double with me to the hospital, just so he can glare balefully at the doctor's lackeys. ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/118664398/117261) | | From: | lots42 |
| Date: | April 19th, 2007 01:50 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
Most women I talked with say they just want someone to listen to their rantings and not actually -give- advice.
So either you're screwing up and giving advice when you're 'supposed' to be listening or ... we need to add something new to to Male Wisdom everywhere and say 'If a woman asks, 'What do you think I should do' about anything, flee'. ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/5301597/727724) | | From: | chitin |
| Date: | April 19th, 2007 01:52 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | Ferrett - I thought this might give you something to write your congressman about | (Link) |
|
Postal regulators have accepted a proposal from media giant Time Warner that would stifle small and independent publishers in America. The plan unfairly burdens smaller publishers with higher postage rates while locking in special privileges for bigger media companies. In establishing the U.S. postal system, the nation's founders wanted to ensure that a diversity of viewpoints were available to "the whole mass of the people." Time Warner's rate increase reverses this egalitarian ideal and threatens the marketplace of ideas on which our democracy depends. Earlier this year, the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) rejected a postal rate increase plan offered by the U.S. Postal Service. Instead they opted to implement a complicated plan submitted by media giant Time Warner. (Click here to read the decision and click here for a timeline) Under the original plan, all publishers would have a mostly equal increase (approx. 12 percent) in the cost for mailing their publications. The Time Warner plan overturned this level playing field to favor large, ad-heavy magazines like People at the expense of smaller publications like In These Times and The American Spectator. It penalizes thousands of small- to medium-sized outlets with disproportionately higher rates while locking in privileges for bigger companies. It's time stand up for independent media. Demand that Congress step in to stop the unfair rate hikes. The deadline for comments to the Postal Service is fast approaching. Sign the petition ( http://action.freepress.net/campaign/postal) before April 23 to alert Congress and put the Postal Board of Governors on notice. - source Free Press, USPS Copy/pasted from NYC_FOR_FREE ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/2866866/711176) | | From: | theferrett |
| Date: | April 19th, 2007 11:02 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | Re: Ferrett - I thought this might give you something to write your congressman about | (Link) |
|
Actually, we debated this on Tuesday with an author who had been published by small presses, and we didn't see the problem with it. The Time-Warner people are big movers, shipping out tons of magazines. The logic of them not getting a discount (and the fact that the small presses we know, who are not shy, have not been shrieking about this to the heavens) made it kind of a wash.
In short, it may be bad, but not so bad that I am convinced to leap off of my chair. Yet. Right. It takes so many hours to write coherently on controversial topics and then defend your arguments in a timely and literate fashion. Where does the impetus to do this come from? Seems like so much work for so little payoff.
Hope you can monetize this little thing you've got going, someday. You said: "You know, I should probably write about the way that some people ask for advice, and then get all upset when they actually get some."
When you do write that one, please remember that it's human nature to feel bad when you hear a personal criticism given in the name of advice.
Good communication is the responsibility of both parties. If I ask for advice on my love life and you tell me (for example) that I'm an idiot who keeps falling for assholes and that I need to get my head out of my ass, and then blame me for getting upset about that, chances are I won't ask you again. And I'll probably be hurt, because it could have been said nicer. That doesn't mean I wouldn't think about it, agree you're right, and take my head out of my ass, but my first reaction will be emotional because people feel before they think. And you would go away thinking, "well, she asked for advice and then got upset because I gave it to her." Our relationship would have been damaged to the point where you never got a chance to find out that I did end up taking the advice.
I have no idea if you are mean when you give advice and there are people out there who only want to hear what they've already determined to be the right way to do something. I'm just responding to a concern I felt when I read that line. I am amused. But how'd you get ahold of the strip prematurely? I'm not upset, just curious. It's up there with today's date. I only noticed after I opened up the HOTS main page that you're still showing "What You Think He Do After?" there. One of the many things I do with the Massive Tool program I've written is keep track of all my webcomics. It displays, on one page, all of the comics for the current date which it can (not all comics have the date in the image URL, or allow hotlinking, etc.); and when I hit a button, it opens all of the comics (their actual pages) into my browser, each on a seperate tab. So, when I viewed "today's comics", I saw Karla's Wheel of Blogging; but then when I opened up the HOTS page, I saw the old one. I assumed that I had just caught you in the midst of updating or something. So ... what are the couple of wheel options which I can't see? I just updated it with more options, from the script. So, can I sponsor this strip for $5? Alas, no. It'd be perfect, but that one's already been taken by Penguicon.
*shakes fist at ceiling* SPARTAKHAAAAAAAAN! Will the Wheel be appearing again anytime soon? Oh, I'm already thinking of the Wheel of Psychodrama. Well, I call dibs on sponsoring that one. ![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/86931915/7482592) | | | thoughts on why the Virginia shootings evoked a frenzy of anguished postings from LJ, whereas the m | (Link) |
|
I'd think that a relatively simple two-fold answer
1) American lives are more important to Americans than non-American lives. And its not just 1 A > 1 N/A, its more like 1 A > 10 N/A or even 1 A > 100 N/A. Hell, with some really overzealous quasi-fascist types (the "nuke the fuckers into a glass parking lot" types), its probably 1 A > {infinite} N/A.
2) School shootings are rare. People dying in Iraq is a daily occurance. The new Iraqi national motto might as well be "Another day, another bombing".
Also, personally, I think the VT shootings are more interesting psychologically. Iraq is relatively simple Sunni-vs-Shite, Islamcism, and anti-Americanism. What drives a kid over the edge? What does "Ismael Ax" mean? Is anyone else intrigued by the irony of a Korean kid majoring in English lit killing students in a German language class? If I tried to keep things in my head, they get erased by some unseen chalk board eraser. I have to write everything down right away, and later get back to my piles of things I listed. But at least I keep those stacks in certain places and eventually get to them. If you don't post the blogs, you've let the terrorists win!
Okay no, not really. I'm just curious about what the two topics are too. Plus, it would be fun to see everyone get all worked up and feel like they're improving the world by arguing uselessly on the interwebs.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/26382022/5727114) | | From: | phroexx |
| Date: | April 20th, 2007 01:01 pm (UTC) |
|---|
| | | (Link) |
|
If I promise not to make any drama whatsoever about them, May I please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please read the Fatal Three?
Pretty please? With Kahlua on top? Nope. Those are not something I feel like debating. |
|