RE: 1. Thank you and will do (in regards to understanding and sleep and such...I do understand.)

RE: 2. Nothing I wrote was intended as insult. I'm a Sag. I'm very blunt about insults to the point of almost ending up in fist-fights over it so if what I was typing was interpreted as insults, that was not the intention and I do appologize.

RE 3. I appreciate the simplification. Secret: this is only a sticking point because I used to use myself as example in many arguments and got nailed on it so now, I tend to see it and point it out with far more frequency than I used to.

RE 4: No real response. This could be an interesting topic of discussion though.

RE 5: I never mentioned coersion, though I wonder where the line between seduction and coersion is...again, another topic of discussion...


As for the rest...I personally believe that there is more to sexuality than just the physical. And before I elaborate, I want to make sure that that makes sense. Does the idea that there is more to sexuality than the physical make sense?

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

Absolutely. I spoke of it above.

I have three discussion points here that I will post publicly in my journal in the am. It should be interesting.

I think you'll find a balanced bunch there.

Not to mention, I haven't made a SERIOUS post PUBLIC there in a long time.

I'm sure ferrett will be happy to be rid of me :)

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

I will look for it in the morning. Until then, good night.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)