The Watchtower of Destruction: The Ferrett's Journal - The Movie Report
February 8th, 2005
08:04 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
The Movie Report

So Gini and I made good progress on our Annual Oscar Hunt this weekend, completing our viewing of all the films in the Best Picture and Best Actor categories. (Alas, I have no interest in seeking out the barely-played Vera Drake or Being Julia, and I'm not sure we have the strength of character to endure the running sobfest that is Maria, Full of Grace.)

But since you folks liked it the last time, here are quickie reviews of all the movies I've seen recently:

Finding Neverland. I wasn't looking forward to this movie because I was expecting another sentimentalized load of Hollywood feel-good claptrap about how Childhood is a Magical Thing – the sort of role that Robin Williams beat to death with a club years ago. (And I like Robin Williams.) Instead, what I got was a surprisingly nuanced script that understands that both childhood and adulthood are tools, needed for different psychological developments, and that being grown up is necessary even if it's not always as fun. I was impressed.

Though I know Jamie Foxx will take the Oscar for Best Actor, I'm actually rooting for Johnny Depp; whereas Jamie became Ray, he never made me feel for Ray. It was an uncanny caricature, but I didn't grasp the heart of Ray Charles from watching Jamie. Whereas Johnny Depp maneuvers his way through a surprisingly subtle role with grace and style, putting emotion and tenderness into an expressionless, reserved character. In other words, I forgot that Jamie Foxx was playing a role but I didn't care about the guy on-screen, whereas I never forgot that it was Johnny Depp but I cared deeply for the guy he was playing. So go, Johnny.


Hotel Rwanda. There was a comic book writer in the late 1980s named Peter B. Gillis, who specialized in the worst and most morbid plot twists you could ever imagine. He first came to my attention writing Strikeforce: Morituri, a series wherein the superheroes got cool powers, but overloaded and melted into horrible flesh-piles within a year of going active. (Thanks to stevietee for reminding me of the name of the series.)

I remember picking up Peter's books because no matter how bad things got, somehow in the next issue he'd top himself with something even worse. And yet it was never a bad thing that came from nowhere… the new horrible plot twist followed logically from everything that had come before, and yet over the course of two years nothing good ever happened.

I thought this might just be Strikeforce, which was inherently given to tragedy… but I followed him to other series, and in every issue the ghastliest thing would occur. I don't know how he did it.

Hotel Rwanda must have been written by this guy. It's like holding your breath for ninety minutes, because it starts out with a guy in a hotel in Africa – he has a nice life, great wife, kids and family – and then there's a revolution and everyone he knows is getting killed. From that point forward, every five minutes something happens where you are absolutely certain everyone he knows will die. You don't know how he'll get out of it and thank God he did and oh Jesus here's another one.

A frighteningly good film, and soberingly real. Put it on the shelf with Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer, Schindler's List, and Requiem for a Dream as "a movie I'm glad I saw since I needed to know what it was like, but that's enough for me thank you."


Ray. Just like "Lord of the Rings" was proof that you can have an Oscar-worthy movie without an Oscar-worthy performance in it, here's proof that you can have an Oscar-worthy performance in a movie that's not Oscar-worthy.

Everything interesting you need to know about Ray is revealed in the trailer. Other than that, the movie is a long, tedious journey of a man who finds success and more success and drugs and more drugs. It's well-directed, but as one wag noted, "two hours into it, it was still only 1965. I began to wonder if it was being filmed in real time."


Million Dollar Baby. Everyone talks about the "surprising plot twist" in this movie, which isn't really surprising at all if you know that it's Oscar-nominated. Once it is an Oscar nominee, you have to look at it and ask, "What does the Academy Awards value about all else?" And the answer is, of course, self-evident.

That said, it's the usual Clint fare; cleanly acted, sparsely-directed, sentiment-free but moving. It made boxing interesting and strategic and yet kept it at a realistic, ring-level view without turning every fight into a Rocky III-style comic-book slugfest. Worth watching, if you don't mind the crushing nihilism that Clint loves directing.


Saved. Surprisingly cute. I'm a total sucker for any film with Disparate People Falling In Love, as long as they don't overplay the "I can't go out with you" card. And the nice thing about Saved! is that everyone is flawed; the heroes are way too mean and vindictive at times, and the "bad" Christians have some very good qualities about them. Nobody's a villain, just some people are less tolerant in areas where it's important to other people. I liked that.


M. Some films are notable for being groundbreaking and still viewable, whereas others are notable for being groundbreaking but they're so awkward in their first steps that they're not worth watching now that others have refined the formula. I give full credit: M pioneered the idea of the "suspense builds while we hunt for the serial killer," but the hunt is impersonal, like a documentary, and the climax is that sort of talky contrived psycho-therapy stuff that never happens anywhere but in bad black-and-white flicks. A classic movie, to be sure – classically bad.


Bend It Like Beckham. There are movies where you can predict the next plot twist merely by asking, "What would be the most awkward thing that could happen next?" And lo and behold, every time I asked that question while watching Bend It Like Beckham, that exact thing happened. It was cute, but suffered an overload of plot twists.


The Station Agent. A note to independent film: "Quirky," "Brooding," and "Funny" are three adjectives that don't mix. You can choose only two and have it work. The critics told me this was a funny and quirky movie, and since it involved a midget I believed them… but actually, it's a brooding quirky movie wherein Damaged People Help Each Other To Feel Normal. That, I didn't need.


Sling Blade. I read the script for this a long time ago, and it was brilliant. Ten minutes of Billy Bob Thornton's grating "Mmm-hmm, mmm-hmm" retarded guy performance, and I had to shut off the television before I clawed my eardrums out. Perhaps the most annoying voice transformation in movie history.


The French Connection. Yes, that was a very exciting car chase. And a pretty cool "hunting down the drugs in the car" scene. The rest of the movie is discardable, like the wrapper around a fast-food burger.


Bad Taste. Yes, Peter, you can have a lot of gore in your movie. As much as you want. Alas, this early film is nothing but makeup blood, as opposed to later films like Heavenly Creatures and Dead Alive, which at least made stabs (so to speak) at characterization.

(59 shouts of denial | Tell me I'm full of it)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:dagrrl
Date:February 8th, 2005 05:19 am (UTC)
(Link)
Saved! - We'd just seen that about two weeks ago. I'm quite fond of that, and especially after living in the south. Anything that depicts what a struggle it is to be a "good Christian" or to NOT be a "good Christian" and that can throw a little humor around with it is a winner in my book.

Sling Blade - Yeah, the voice is annoying, but if you are able to stand it for longer periods of time you come up with some gems for quotes -- "Ah shure do like them french-fried pertaters" being one of my personal favorites.
From:stevietee
Date:February 8th, 2005 05:21 am (UTC)
(Link)
Strikeforce Morituri?
/geek
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 05:26 am (UTC)
(Link)
THANK YOU.

Jesus, that was gonna bug me all day.
[User Picture]
From:yendi
Date:February 8th, 2005 05:30 am (UTC)
(Link)
There's a nifty bio/bibliography of Gillis over here.

[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 08:12 am (UTC)
(Link)
Ah, that's good readin'.
[User Picture]
From:queen_o_hearts
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:05 am (UTC)
(Link)
"a movie I'm glad I saw since I needed to know what it was like, but that's enough for me thank you."

My father served in Rwanda, under Dalaire.... I can't watch this movie, but know I should.
[User Picture]
From:shawnj
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:25 am (UTC)
(Link)
Have you read Dalaire's book? I've never read something so horrific.
[User Picture]
From:blergeatkitty
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:18 am (UTC)
(Link)
Before I had a chance to see it, Million Dollar Baby got spoiled for me at the trivia night that I frequent. I did enjoy it, though - the actual fight sequences were absolutely gorgeous.

I'm not sure I would have liked it as much if it hadn't been about one of my pet interests, though - it felt like a Clint Eastwood vanity project but contrived with Oscar in mind. I wish that for once the Academy would give Best Picture to a gut-bustingly hilarious movie - there are other emotions besides pathos, and a good movie evokes more than one.
[User Picture]
From:tfcocs
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:27 am (UTC)
(Link)
M. Some films are notable for being groundbreaking and still viewable, whereas others are notable for being groundbreaking but they're so awkward in their first steps that they're not worth watching now that others have refined the formula. I give full credit: M pioneered the idea of the "suspense builds while we hunt for the serial killer," but the hunt is impersonal, like a documentary, and the climax is that sort of talky contrived psycho-therapy stuff that never happens anywhere but in bad black-and-white flicks. A classic movie, to be sure – classically bad.

I view that film differently, especially considering the issues I discussed in my journal yesterday. I saw M all the way through on cable for the first time about a year ago, and was amazed at what I saw, The contrived psychotherapy? Perhaps---but consider the timeline. Sigmund Freud was still alive when the film was made.

One might also consider the fact that the film was made in 1930, three years before the rise of Hitler. That fact makes the film eerily prescient.
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:30 am (UTC)
(Link)
I don't care, though. Freud's also dated.

It may be a breakthrough, and fascinating because of the way it handles the concepts. But the Model T is also a breakthrough and way ahead of its time, but I doubt you'd be driving one for comfort today.
[User Picture]
From:shawnj
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:27 am (UTC)
(Link)
Bad Taste was meant to be a parody of sorts, on splatter movies. There's an interesting story about how he got funding for it and how long it took.
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 07:23 am (UTC)
(Link)
Got a link?
[User Picture]
From:miripanda
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:35 am (UTC)
(Link)
I'm so sorry you missed Vera Drake - I reviewed it, and really found it to be one of the most absorbing and touching films I've seen in a while. Maybe when it comes out on Netflix?
[User Picture]
From:zoethe
Date:February 8th, 2005 07:12 am (UTC)
(Link)
Actually, it's only just opened here, I believe (limited indie film issue). I'm sort of hoping to see it this coming weekend.
From:kahunadoctor
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:39 am (UTC)
(Link)
Definately appreciate the reviews! The ones in the papers are just too damn lame. Honesty is always the best policy. :)
[User Picture]
From:theonlykow
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:42 am (UTC)
(Link)
I support Saved! all the way. Easily in my Top Ten of the year, possibly in the Top Five. I haven't had the time or energy to attempt a Top Ten, mostly because off the top of my head I can only think of... seven movies I really, truly loved and even then six of them are a battle for spots seven through two.
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 08:12 am (UTC)
(Link)
Yeah, we're gonna be buyin' it. It's such a sweet movie, really.
[User Picture]
From:lizzola
Date:February 8th, 2005 07:18 am (UTC)
(Link)
Try American Splendor.
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 07:24 am (UTC)
(Link)
Already did.

I love Paul Giamatti.
[User Picture]
From:ersatzinsomnia
Date:February 8th, 2005 08:38 am (UTC)
(Link)
Re: M

Ah! Mein hertz!

Seriously, though, I can see where you're coming from in your assessment. It helps that I've always associated the film with an antique copy of "Three Penny Opera" (where Mack the Knife comes from), which has an enormous legacy, but is a massive snooze-fest. Steeled me for this film. I was willing to forgive the crudity of the film's structure and the absurd psycology in light of the era.

I found two aspects of it great, though. The first was the title premise, with the "M" mark on Lorre's back, and him confusedly dashing through the streets as everyone around him (from his perspective) somehow just 'knowing' the terrible things he'd done, just from looking at him. The second was Lorre's performance in the kangaroo court. Pathetic, almost pitiable desperation. He knows he's done these terrible things, and is conflicted between knowing he deserves to die and still, pathetically, wanting to go on living. He's a decrepid, horrible monster, and he knows it. The film begins with a mediocre "hunt for the serial killer" (refined much better over the years and years of films that followed) but switches midway through to the panic of the pursued killer caught out, and Lorre's pitiable desperation when caught. I think those two aspects of the film are what make it an interesting classic, not the story that frames it.

Serial killer flicks today are much more black-and-white (IRONY!) in their portrayal of the villian. The villian is evil, sadistic, cunning, clever, and nothing else. In the more fictional accounts they're even glorified as hyper-intelligent or insightful, in the manner of Hannibal Lecter or the killer from Se7en. Certainly not understandable, not pathetic, not human. Lorre managed a much more complicated character, back when they were still working out the genre.
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 10:32 am (UTC)
(Link)
That's an interesting point. I hadn't thought about the superman-like nature of the serial killer. Lorre's performance is, interestingly enough, better when he's being chased - I found his killer's speech a little hammy. Still, it wasn't awful, just not good on its own merits.
[User Picture]
From:zero_design
Date:February 8th, 2005 08:41 am (UTC)
(Link)
"Finding Neverland. I wasn't looking forward to this movie because I was expecting another sentimentalized load of Hollywood feel-good claptrap about how Childhood is a Magical Thing ... Instead, what I got was a surprisingly nuanced script that understands that both childhood and adulthood are tools, needed for different psychological developments, and that being grown up is necessary even if it's not always as fun. I was impressed."

*chuckles* Perhaps Depp is a star in his own way, what with the good script selection ;)
[User Picture]
From:theferrett
Date:February 8th, 2005 10:25 am (UTC)
(Link)
Good script selection is a LARGE part of being a star.
[User Picture]
From:purplkat
Date:February 8th, 2005 08:42 am (UTC)
(Link)
I LOVED Finding Neverland.

It was a bit of comfort to me, because after Lord of the Rings came out and all my friends were goobering over this great movie rendition of their favorite childhood book, Peter Pan was released. Now, Peter Pan was my 'Lord of the Rings'. It was the book I demanded my father read to me over and over as a child (and then I read it over and over once I could read well enough). I wanted to BE Peter Pan. Not Tinkerbell -- Peter. With the flying and the swashbuckling and the laughing at Captain Hook. You can see shades of that childhood obsession in The Novel, which essentially retells Peter Pan in an interesting way. (Not intentional, but that's what happened)

And, of course, Peter Pan sucked. It completely twisted the book. It was terrible. The way the characters acknowledged that they were just characters? Ugh. The bit in the end with Peter controlling Neverland? UGH! If Captain Hook hadn't been all sexy, it would have been a complete loss.

So I was really happy when 'Finding Neverland' wound up being so good. It's not quite the same, but at least it's SOMETHING.
[User Picture]
From:muffytaj
Date:February 8th, 2005 06:44 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I sympathise so much. I just about went ballistic at the movies, what with Wendy giving Peter her 'special kiss' and then...that last line about him never returning! WTF PEOPLE! WHERE IS THE LEGACY OF PETER PAN MEANT TO *gives up and resorts to incoherent rambling* They managed to make Hook much more sympathetic than the Disney one, but still cut out his English Boys self (why do they keep doing that? He was always conflicted about the morality of the things he did, even if it was a rather screwed up morality)

Man, if they were going to mess with the movie so much they should have changed the ending so I got a happy one, rather than the bittersweet one of the book. The ending always broke my heart, and reminded me of the curse that never growing up has.

Then Wendy's special kiss would have actually meant something, rather than inducing what looked like Peter Pan's first erection. *bitter*
[User Picture]
From:darthfox
Date:February 8th, 2005 09:22 am (UTC)
(Link)
bend it like beckham is in this year's oscar contention? i'm confused. i saw it (in charlottesville, VA) in may of 2003.
[User Picture]
From:zoethe
Date:February 8th, 2005 09:38 am (UTC)
(Link)
He started with Oscar films and then went on to "other movies he has seen of late." Threw me off for a second, too!
[User Picture]
From:candiedheart
Date:February 8th, 2005 09:55 am (UTC)
(Link)
I loved Finding Neverland, and truly feel that Johnny Depp deserves an Oscar for his performance, but know that they are going to give it to Jamie Foxx. I have yet to see Ray (it's on it's way in the mail as I am typing out this wonderful comment), but have heard from various sources that it did not truly incapsulate the man that Ray Charles was.

That, and the fact that I heard they left out quite a big chunk of his life is terrible.

And the nice thing about Saved! is that everyone is flawed - That's why I loved it. A lot of my friends can't stand it, but they can't see past all the "mockery". They don't get that the movie is making fun of people, not one specific person, and that it is also celebrating the differences that come with uniqueness.
[User Picture]
From:miripanda
Date:February 8th, 2005 11:32 am (UTC)
(Link)
I completely agree with you on Ray, by the way. I'm rooting for Don Cheadle, because I haven't seen Finding Neverland, but it's for the exact reason you mentioned - I really really felt for Paul Rusesibagina, but Ray I couldn't sympathize with. It was like Foxx captured all the physical traits but didn't make us understand the emotional ones.
[User Picture]
From:sirbmckenzie
Date:February 8th, 2005 11:38 am (UTC)
(Link)
Am I the only person on this earth who didn't love Finding Neverland? It broke my heart, in fact - I went in expecting thoughtful, nuanced musing on childhood and whatnot, and got what felt to me like an overload of sentimental and poorly-acted cliche, complete with pitiful consumptive cough as harbinger of doom. The exact opposite experience of the Ferrett's, in fact. The little kid who played Peter was the only bright spot for me. I didn't even find Johnny Depp especially attractive in it, and that's really saying something.

Same thing happened to me with Hero. The rest of the world loves it, I get all excited, and then I have to sit through 3 hours of extremely picturesque flutterings with no real characters or soul.
[User Picture]
From:chris2342
Date:February 8th, 2005 11:49 am (UTC)
(Link)
Nice. Thanks for more reviews. For the record,
A: I think Bad Taste is the only not even worth watching film that Jackson has made.

B: Thank God someone else feels the same way I did about The French Connection

C: Whats wrong with brooding quirky movies where damaged people help each other to feel normal? Come on, that's like dismissing over 50% of the American indie films. Seriously though, I adored The Station Agent and clearly you must have been temporarily insane and thus will be forgiven.

D: Love Clint's crushing nihilism. Although, I don't think I'd use those exact words.

E: Um, shit. There was something else. Oh yeah, do another one of these soon. And start watching some more obscure films, for christ's sake! I wanna see Ferrets reviews of randomly selected Asian horror and gangster films. Yay!
[User Picture]
From:chrestomanci
Date:February 8th, 2005 12:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Re: Sling Blade: Perhaps the most annoying voice transformation in movie history.

I dunno. I only made it about twenty minutes into Fargo.

LOVED Saved, though. "[The Bible] is NOT a weapon!" is perhaps my favorite line in the entire movie.
[User Picture]
From:sarahwilder
Date:February 8th, 2005 12:18 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Glad to hear about Finding Neverland.

Ray- Jamie Foxx didi a great Ray Charles imitation for the entire film, but I never *felt* Ray Charles or felt like I had a better sense of him. It was like reading a good set of biographical facts.
[User Picture]
From:miripanda
Date:February 8th, 2005 04:27 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Sorry to keep re-posting, but I was re-reading your post, and noticed what you said about not wanting to bother seeking out 3 of the smaller movies that produced the Best Actress nominees, and it reminded me of this article

"Why doesn't Hollywood Care?"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872768/

It just explores the nature of the disconnect between the size and scope of the "best actor" movies and the "best actress" movies, and how many of the best actor nominees appear in best picture nominees, but the same is not true of the actresses.
[User Picture]
From:microchip
Date:February 8th, 2005 05:42 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Just like "Lord of the Rings" was proof that you can have an Oscar-worthy movie without an Oscar-worthy performance in it

That's a bit harsh isn't it? Admittedly a large part of it came from the amazing talents of JRR Tolkien, and some nice directing and effects... but I'd say they played their roles rather well.

Oh well, just my 2p.
[User Picture]
From:batshua
Date:February 9th, 2005 08:36 pm (UTC)
(Link)
My mother dragged me to see Maria, Full of Grace. Not only is it very depressing, it's also pretty damned disgusting.
The Ferrett's Domain Powered by LiveJournal.com