The Watchtower of Destruction: The Ferrett's Journal - Film Review: I Am Legend
December 15th, 2007
10:52 am

[Link]

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Film Review: I Am Legend

When I Am Legend forgets that it’s supposed to have a plot, it is one of the greatest science fiction films ever made. But about three-quarters of the way through the film, it remembers that indeed! This is supposed to have An Ending, with An Emotional Climax! And with this revelation, it ratches up the Contrive-O-Meter, ratcheting away from the compelling story of a desperately lonely man fighting for survival to turn into predictable Hollywood schlock.

The story of I Am Legend is simple: A cure for cancer has mutated into a deadly virus that has killed 95% of the people on Earth. The remaining 5% have turned into light-sensitive vampires who need blood and are destroyed by ultraviolet light.

The sole survivor? Robert Neville, scientist and army Colonel, who remains at the site of the outbreak – New York City, which has been dead and rotting for three years.

He is a man of strict routine; it’s the way he fights against the emptiness of having no other people and no hope. He gets up in the morning, does exercises (and displays a sculpted body that could turn a straight man gay), goes down into his laboratory basement to try to cure the virus (which could revert vampires to normal men). Then he goes out to hunt through the ruins of New York.

What’s happened to New York City is breathtaking. The film’s at its best when its looking over the decay of civilization, the lush overload of billboards and signs suddenly overlaid with rot and plants. It looks like the grave of all humanity, the final legacy on its way out by nature, and the visuals are spectacular.

Neville is, sadly, also going insane, which is clearly shown when he goes to the video store. He has one faithful companion – a beautiful, friendly dog named Sam, who is his only contact with other people.

I Am Legend is absolutely genius when it is just exploring the life of the last survivor on Earth. Watching Robert Neville’s routine crumble as the loneliness takes him is some of the most compelling cinema around; he has all the material goods he could want, but not a person to share it with, and the sheer number of comforts he’s built up tells you how much time he’s spent there. Neville has a military temperament and a fierce willpower, but everything he loved, every last hope, has been taken from him. He’s stubbornly convinced he can fix it, but we only believe he can because this is a movie and miracles sometimes happen.

It is a look into the damned.

Unfortunately, the film is handicapped somewhat because it’s based on a book. And the book of I Am Legend has one of the best endings in all of science fiction/horror, turning everything you knew about the man and his world upon its head and producing something grand and glorious. To a large extent, I Am Legend the book is about that rare and unique ending, and so when the movie departs from it it’s a disappointment.

In the book, Robert Neville finds a survivor named Ruth, who he takes back to his apartment. He’s deeply mistrustful of Ruth, and it turns out he’s right to be; Ruth is a vampire. It turns out that some of the infected people have found a way to hold the disease at bay, returning to a more-or-less human state. They have reassembled their own civilization, they have their own government… But as vampires, they’re still forced into their torpor at night, and look no different from the barbaric vampires (whom they pity) while they’re sleeping.

Yet Robert has never stopped hunting.

In his ignorance, Neville has been killing both the saved and the unsaved vampires, and has become a thing of legend. He is now the boogeyman of this new, mutated humanity – the thing that creeps into their house when they are helpless and slaughters them. In fact, he’s held this new vampire civilization in a grip of terror for years. They find him and execute him, but he can’t help but laugh – he’ll be the vampire legend of the vampires, the greatest monster they know.

(END ENDING)

The fact that the ending differs from the book isn’t a fatal one – I don’t demand fidelity in my adaptations, only good movies. Yet if you’re going to yank out one of the all-time classic finales and replace it, then you’d better replace it with something better… Or, at least, swap it in with something that’s as unique as the rest of the movie. But the ending to the movie of I Am Legend feels as though they cut the end out of some other sci-fi movie and plopped it in here wholesale, leaving loose ends galore.

What we get feels vaguely recycled, the kind of heroic climax we’ve seen too many times before. And after the hot newness of the first three-quarters, it’s oddly disappointing to lapse back into Generic Hero Endings 102.

Strangely enough, there are repeated hints in the film that point towards the old ending, perhaps artifacts left over from the original screenplay. There are a few plot points raised that never get resolved by this new end, but would be explained completely by the “classic” ending, making it a strange experience for both the folks who’ve read the book (who caught the hints and wondered) and those who haven’t (who wondered what the heck was going on with that?).

What you get is three-quarters of a great movie with a quarter of an okay ending tacked on. It’s like watching a pole vaulter do a near-perfect vault and then clip the bar with his ankle, knocking this from an A-lister to a perfectly good movie, even an exceptional one…. But not a great one.

You haven’t seen the first part of I Am Legend before. That is, as Barney Stinson would put it, “Legend….ary.” The ending is serviceable. Make your own judgments from there.

(Tell me I'm full of it)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:[info]kneefers
Date:December 15th, 2007 04:05 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I did like I Am Legend, and I'd really like to read the book. I didn't really mind the ending, though this may be because it was pretty much what I expected.
[User Picture]
From:[info]kokanh
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:23 pm (UTC)
(Link)
After you read the book, you'll probably like the movie less. The ending of the book is fucking fantastic.
[User Picture]
From:[info]daveamongus
Date:December 15th, 2007 04:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The title makes a lot more sense given the book ending.

If they don't keep that ending, you have to wonder why they didn't scrap the title, too, like the other two movie adaptations.
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:39 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Well, the new ending does give a meaning to it. But it's not the same meaning, obviously.
[User Picture]
From:[info]bhagwan
Date:December 15th, 2007 04:49 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Maybe this is a new marketing trend in the making. Release a movie with a fucked-up ending. Put out the DVD. Then you can re-release with the original ending amid tons of controversy to stir up a buzz.

One can only hope.
[User Picture]
From:[info]ravenblack
Date:December 15th, 2007 07:09 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I was going to say that too. "Director's Cut". They've learned this from the four distinct releases of Blade Runner.
[User Picture]
From:[info]kmg_365
Date:December 17th, 2007 01:51 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The original ending will be restored in the Broadway adaptation: I Am Legend - The Musical.
[User Picture]
From:[info]kisekinotenshi
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:03 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Maybe they filmed a different ending and it'll be on the DVD release. I'll still probably see the movie in theaters because I really like it when Will Smith does new and interesting stuff (even if it technically still falls into the action hero category) and I want to encourage him to continue doing it. Even if it's only for 3/4 of the movie. XD
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:42 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I doubt they filmed a different ending, if only because of the expense. But it'd be nice to think.
[User Picture]
From:[info]laurapatrick
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
After reading your review of "Dan in Real Life", I went to see it.

I was underwhelmed. It had its moments, but how did you get past its glaring amounts of applied formula? Poor widow. Widow meets girl. Widow loses girl. Widow get worst room in house. Widow gets multitudes of family interference. Widow (very humorously) gets speeding ticket. Widow gets girl back.

It was ok, but very much by the book. I didn't see a lot of originalness to it.
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:32 pm (UTC)
(Link)
That'd be very strange indeed, considering I haven't seen "Dan In Real Life." *g*
[User Picture]
From:[info]kokanh
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:22 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I absolutely HATED how the ending completely undermines everything the book was about. I mean, I was loving the movie until he met Anna. One of the essential plot points of the book was that NEVILLE WAS THE ONLY SURVIVOR. Even when he had thought he found another human being, he was being betrayed. As soon as you introduce another real survivor, the movie can't be as good as it could be.
Another thing I had a problem with was the CGI vampires, which you don't really mention. The scariest thing about the vampires in the book was their humanity. They remember what they were, they still kind of look the same as humans,they could talk--Cortman, Neville's friend before the virus hit, taunts him from the outside and nearly convinces him to come out, night after night. That's pretty terrifying.
I don't know. When you forget that Neville was supposed to be a legend among the vampires, not a legend among the surviving humans, the message gets lost. I was wondering if the person who wrote the screenplay even read the book at all.
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 15th, 2007 05:38 pm (UTC)
(Link)
See, the ending undermining the book doesn't bother me. As I said, I don't demand that the movie follows the book, merely that the movie is a good movie.

That said, the ending here is a little weak given that it's both sacrifice and suicide, but acknowledges only the first. That bothered me.

I do agree that the CGI vampires were a little distracting, but only because it wasn't the greatest CGI. I'll take them for what they are - mindless yelling machines.
[User Picture]
From:[info]happydog
Date:December 15th, 2007 06:45 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I know you've seen Omega Man, which was the previous adaptation (I use the word loosely) of the book I Am Legend. How would you compare the two? (Given that, OK, Omega Man, IIRC, is very close to MST3K material.)
[User Picture]
From:[info]masque12
Date:December 15th, 2007 07:48 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The earlier adaptation, Last Man on Earth, with Vincent Price, still sounds like the best movie translation of I Am Legend, to me.
[User Picture]
From:[info]anon52
Date:December 15th, 2007 09:09 pm (UTC)
(Link)
You should track down and watch The Quiet Earth.

Great film, and i wouldn't be surprised if/when i see IAL to find that there are very many similarities in the first parts of each.
[User Picture]
From:[info]sumidha
Date:December 16th, 2007 12:55 am (UTC)
(Link)
yesss, that's one of the cult classic movies in my house that no one else has ever heard of :)

the church scene? priceless.
[User Picture]
From:[info]capybyra
Date:December 15th, 2007 09:32 pm (UTC)

The psychodynamics of a "faithful to the book" movie?

(Link)
/me reads books way too deeplu and absorbs too much at times...

Much of what makes some stories fly or crash as movies is psychodynamics in action. That term defined as a balance of tensions.
OR tensions most of us might never even envision as fictions.

Let alone have an actor make us feel as if it were "us in their role"

Much of the screaming nightmare inducing value that the original book held was in drawing "Me" into that situation. Me having to do with my wife and baby as Neville did... Folks- at the time "Wife", let alone "Baby" were abstractions to me- I was 15-16 when I read the book,
But the depth of induced soul shredding to this day squicks me.

A humorous memory serves me right for allowing myself to restimulate such horrors. IIRC Compton was mentioned in the book?
Would not there be parts of Compton that "as is" could do quite well at depicting post Armageddon? And the book's application of the Tar Pits somehow resonated as species karma across time.


Oh Yeah- the original book had a WONDERFUL product placement spot for some savvy Genset mfr:>

"Is YOUR Genset vampire resistant?"
[User Picture]
From:[info]phenimore
Date:December 15th, 2007 10:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
After watching this last night all six of us agreed that the movie was fantastic until it changed. The introduction of another character at the point is dizzyingly surreal. It loses focus and then never slows down to let it mean anything more than a deus ex mechanism... 75% great emotional humanity - 25% "did they run out of money and need to finish the movie in a hurry?"
For awhile though they channeled all the best of "castaway" and dare i say "pitch black" and had me... the cgi was distracting but harmless

i do want to read the book now, though!
[User Picture]
From:[info]therrin
Date:December 16th, 2007 01:36 pm (UTC)
(Link)
That scene was so ridiculous. It was Deus Ex Machina, to the most ridiculous extent I've seen in years. And then, they have the gall (which for a little while I accepted as undercurrents of hilarity and a joke by the writer) to explain it all as "God did it." It was a Deus Ex Machina literally explained by it being Deus Ex Mahina. I laughed at that enough to forgive it until the morning.

The entire movie, it was obvious to me (having never read the book) that the vampires had retained human memories and the main vampire was hunting Nevile because he took his wife/girlfriend/lover. Something which Nevile was blind to. It feels like because of that, they could have tracked it back to the original ending easily in that way.
[User Picture]
From:[info]revilo
Date:December 15th, 2007 10:38 pm (UTC)
(Link)
does it count as a book? novella, maybe? short story.
[User Picture]
From:[info]thetathx1138
Date:December 16th, 2007 10:48 pm (UTC)
(Link)
My copy runs about 160 pages, so we're well out of short story territory. Probably a novella.
[User Picture]
From:[info]mb2u
Date:December 15th, 2007 11:30 pm (UTC)
(Link)
What I think happened is somebody decided they couldn't let Will Smith die in the end-too much of a bummer. So they grafted part of Omega Man (not all humans were infected and some were in hiding) onto the plot, which would give them a way to keep Neville alive at the end.

The other possibility was that someone decided that Will Smith could not turn out to be the villain in the end, so there had to be some drastic changes. Again, taking a page from Omega Man and ignoring the "hybrid" vampires so that all vampires were evil, bad things. Problem solved.

The real problem I have with I Am Legend is the same one I had with I, Robot-little of the original story remained.
[User Picture]
From:[info]jaykester
Date:December 16th, 2007 09:08 am (UTC)
(Link)
Wait, did you see the movie? Your explanation explains an ending that was not the ending.
[User Picture]
From:[info]drowningmermaid
Date:December 16th, 2007 12:19 am (UTC)
(Link)
With the ending I've just read here, I may have to go find the book somewhere and hope that they filmed it and just plan on adding it to the DVD as an "alternate" ending so I can see it happen.

I went to see the movie last night and was pretty impressed with it, as was my husband and the friend we went with, but all three of us agree that the 'monsters' could have used a little more CG since they all looked the same (or is that explained in the book as well?). In the end, I loved it but now that you mention the other colony of vampires, certain things (him ripping the shades down in the apartment he searched??) make a little more sense.

Thanks for that eye opener. I really do want to track that book down and add it to my list of reading materials.
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 16th, 2007 12:45 am (UTC)
(Link)
Plus, the vampires had socialized (the Alpha Vampire's reaction to the girl) and learned to lay traps. But then suddenly they were all monsters again.
[User Picture]
From:[info]roninspoon
Date:December 16th, 2007 12:28 am (UTC)
(Link)
I was astonished at the depth of character that Smith was able to portray. It's been a long time since he's been in a film that asked him to extend his talent to this degree. For a film that's ostensibly a horror/SF/action hybrid, it had a surprising number of very touching and emotional moments that Smith sold with aplomb.

The dim ending diminished the impact and message of the story I believe, but it wasn't, in my opinion, enough to diminish the impact of Smith's performance.
[User Picture]
From:[info]thetathx1138
Date:December 16th, 2007 01:12 am (UTC)
(Link)
I just saw it and enjoyed it quite a bit. Certainly one of the better Hollywood films I've seen this year.

Basically I think it lines up well with "Constantine"; it's not a blow-by-blow adaptation of the source material but it makes a sincere and largely successful effort to capture the spirit.

It also gets points for being a movie, not a paycheck; the key personnel obviously wanted to be there and they do great jobs. I won't laugh when people suggest Will Smith for Best Actor, and Francis Lawrence really impressed me here.
[User Picture]
From:[info]yndy
Date:December 16th, 2007 02:30 am (UTC)
(Link)
I was afraid they'd deviate from the book ending (one of the best twists in Horror-SciFi) and you confirm that they do.

I have no doubt that the Hollywoodized ending has Will living and restarting the human race with some cinematic-Eve... which is sad, but expected. I can't imagine the book ending testing well with the average screening-audience.

Good to know in advance tho, so that I will fully enjoy the film, since I'm not expecting it to stay true to the book.

It's hard for those of us bibliophiles who see favorite works turned into movies that aren't up to the book. It's sort of a cinematic-zombification (appropriate in this instance!) wherein the name often remains the same, as do some of the skeletal/structural elements, but the flesh of the story has the rotten floral smell of decay.

Starship Troopers, Silence of the Lambs, every Philip K. Dick story ever turned into a movie... it happens pretty much every time.

[User Picture]
From:[info]thetathx1138
Date:December 16th, 2007 05:54 am (UTC)
(Link)
I disagree; just because the book is good doesn't mean you can pick it up and just transfer it to film. It doesn't work that way for a wide variety of reasons, but the most obvious is that flaws that don't matter as much in the book really leap out at you.

Take "Frankenstein"; great book but the opening chapters are written with much more energy and drive than the rest of it. The James Whale version pretty much launched the book out the window, but it's a wonderful film and it lodged the name "Frankenstein" in the popular consciousness to a level it'd never been before.

The Kenneth Branaugh, on the other hand, which adapts the book letter-for-letter runs out of gas once the opening chapter material is used up.
[User Picture]
From:[info]cosmicbandit
Date:December 16th, 2007 05:37 am (UTC)
(Link)
I guess my husband and I were the only ones to find the movie relentlessly depressing. I'm guessing that the book is more of the same.
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 16th, 2007 05:47 am (UTC)
(Link)
You'd be wrong. The difference is that some of us find that depression to be interesting.

But yes, the book is more of the same.
[User Picture]
From:[info]freethemuffin
Date:December 16th, 2007 03:45 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Wow. The book ending really makes the title fit.
The should have changed the title for the movie, if they were gonna change the ending.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:December 16th, 2007 07:56 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I liked I am Legend, but I do think the book ending would have been better. I haven't read the book, but it seems as though the ending has nothing to do with him finding the cure at all, which is fine except in a movie, that would never happen... In the book, is he looking for the cure the same say he is in the movie?
[User Picture]
From:[info]theferrett
Date:December 16th, 2007 11:23 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Even more so. In the book, he's a schlub who's taken up medicine - in the movie, he's a doctor.
From:[info]friedwallaby
Date:December 17th, 2007 04:37 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I have plans to read the book as soon as Amazon delivers it to my door.

That said, I enjoyed watching Robert Neville do his day to day routine. His anal retentiveness seemed to be the only thing keeping him alive.

Then some people had to come disrupt his delicate balance and !bam!, bad ending. Sometimes I wonder how people who don't follow strict rules even get to the main character to commit the sabotaging in the first place.
The Ferrett's Domain Powered by LiveJournal.com